ASEAN x India: Asia's New Supply Chain

233

The relationship between ASEAN and India is shifting from a “traditional trade” model to a clear structural cooperation within supply chains, with ASEAN serving as the upstream production base and India as the downstream engine.

ASEAN is becoming a driving force in upstream production, while India is emerging as the center of downstream growth and demand. This dynamic, driven by supply chain restructuring, economic structural balance, and geopolitical pressures, is creating a ‘new economic corridor’ that entrepreneurs and investors cannot ignore.

Structural changes in the supply chain.

Currently, Asia's supply chains are shifting towards a more interconnected and decentralized system. This is evident in ASEAN becoming a key destination for global foreign direct investment (FDI) and for the relocation of manufacturing facilities, leading to an influx of factories into Southeast Asia. Meanwhile, India is growing as both a new manufacturing base and a large market.

This new structure clearly reflects the region's changing role in the global supply chain. ASEAN can be viewed as the upstream component of production, while India is the downstream entity that creates value and drives consumption.

In the context of the supply chain, "upstream" refers to the early to mid-stages of the production process, encompassing everything from raw material processing to the manufacturing of semi-finished goods. ASEAN countries such as Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, and Malaysia play a crucial role in this phase, producing and exporting goods such as chemicals, polymers, electronic components, automotive parts, and processed agricultural products.

These goods are not sold for direct consumption, but are “industrial raw materials” that are used in the next stage of the manufacturing process. Therefore, ASEAN can be viewed as a “precision manufacturing layer” that supplies raw materials and components to the economies of downstream countries.

Meanwhile, India serves as the downstream engine of this system, leveraging three key strengths that contribute to the supply of raw materials and components from ASEAN: 1. Large and rapidly growing domestic demand driven by the expansion of the middle class, leading to sustained consumption; 2. Expansion of the manufacturing sector under the “Make in India” policy, which promotes key industries such as electronics, automotive, and infrastructure; and 3. Strengths in the service sector and digital economy, which add value to goods and the overall economy.

When the roles of ASEAN and India are linked, a clear operational structure emerges: ASEAN exports raw materials and semi-finished goods to India, which then assembles and adds value through both manufacturing and services before re-exporting or consuming them domestically. This system is not just a supply chain, but a "shared economic ecosystem" that comprehensively connects production, value addition, and consumption.

At the industry level, it becomes clearer that the structure of “ASEAN representing the upstream role and India representing the downstream role” is not just a theoretical concept but is actually happening in many key production sectors. For example, in the chemical and industrial materials industry, ASEAN acts as a supplier of primary raw materials such as polymers and basic chemicals, which are essential components of downstream industries in India. India then uses these raw materials to manufacture packaging, textiles, and plastics at the downstream level.

Meanwhile, within the electronics industry, the connections are even more pronounced. ASEAN serves as a manufacturing base for key components such as communication equipment, processors, and intermediate electronic parts, while India utilizes these components in product assembly, particularly in the smartphone and consumer electronics industries.

In terms of agricultural products and resources, ASEAN continues to play an upstream role through the export of key commodities such as palm oil and rubber, which India utilizes for both food security and consumer industries. This is an example of an upstream resource dimension that directly supports India's downstream economic base.

Trade data clearly reflects this structure, with trade between ASEAN and India projected to exceed US$2568 billion by 39,000. The largest share of this trade comes from Singapore, valued at over US$12,975 million, followed by Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam.

The value of trade between Thailand and India is projected to reach US$20,930 billion in 2568, with India importing approximately US$15,870 billion from Thailand and exporting approximately US$5,060 billion. Thailand's main exports include plastic pellets, chemicals, vegetable and animal oils, gems and jewelry, and steel products, all of which are semi-finished goods or raw materials for further production.

These data indicate that the trade structure does not focus on end-consumption goods, but rather on "raw materials and industrial components." This suggests that economic relations between ASEAN and India are evolving into a supply chain system with clearly defined roles, where ASEAN serves as the upstream production base and India is the central hub for value creation and full-scale downstream consumption.

New opportunities for entrepreneurs.

This trade structure is not only significant at the macroeconomic level, but also opens up new business opportunities for entrepreneurs in many dimensions.

Firstly, there are opportunities in the semi-finished goods market. This area is becoming a hub for trade, particularly in chemicals, metals, and electronic components. These products often have more stable profit margins and less competition than direct consumer goods, as they require technical expertise and long-term relationships within the supply chain.

Secondly, 2. It presents an opportunity to develop a cross-border business-to-business (BBY) trading platform. Because this market is fragmented and lacks centralized information, many players have difficulty accessing each other. Therefore, creating an efficient "intermediary" or buyer-seller matching system would significantly reduce trading limitations and create new value.

Secondly, 3. The growth of the electric vehicle (EV) supply chain. With Thailand poised to become one of the key industries in the next decade, ASEAN can serve as a manufacturing base for components such as batteries and key elements, while India acts as a large market and assembly base. This creates a promising new ecosystem with high growth potential.

Finally, there are opportunities in data and analytics. Because cross-regional supply chains are highly complex, businesses require insightful data such as product pricing, supply and demand movements, and real-time trade flows. This opens the door for new businesses that serve as “data hubs” or deep analytics platforms specifically focused on the ASEAN-India trade market.

High potential comes with risk.

Although the cooperation structure between ASEAN and India has great potential, it also comes with several significant challenges. Firstly, India's trade deficit with ASEAN could create long-term policy pressure and lead to protectionist measures in certain industries. Secondly, differing regulations and tariffs increase the cost of cross-border business and increase the complexity of market access. Finally, infrastructure limitations in some countries, such as logistics, transportation, or energy systems, can sometimes create bottlenecks in the supply chain.

In summary, the relationship between ASEAN and India is clearly shifting from a “traditional trade” model to structural cooperation in the supply chain, with ASEAN serving as the upstream production base and India as the downstream engine.

When these two roles are effectively interconnected, they create a mutually dependent and complementary economic system with high growth potential, likely to become one of the core economies of Asia in the coming decade. However, the biggest opportunity may not lie in the end product, but in the "flow of value in the supply chain." Those who understand and can strategically integrate themselves into these supply chain "connections," whether in production, transportation, information, or finance, will benefit most from this structural transformation.


Follow and read other columns in the Finance and Banking Journal, July 2569 issue, issue 531, in digital format: https://goo.gl/U6OnIi

Including channels for ordering banking and finance journals Both current and past editions Complete in one place: https://moneyandbanking.co.th/2023/18250/





Money & Banking Magazine